Abstract
At a 387-bed geriatric hospital in Montreal, Canada, a cross-sectional satisfaction survey was conducted on random samples of patients, families, families of deceased patients, and nursing staff. Using the same pretested structured questionnaire, the subjects were asked to rank (assign importance to) and rate (assign a rate of success to) 15 indicators of quality care. Significant differences both between and within the four groups were found on the perceived importance and rate of success of many of the indicators, supporting the primary hypotheses. Ethnicity and several sociodemographic covariates influenced the importance and rate of success assigned to the key indicators. The article discusses survey methodology issues as well as the integration of a satisfaction survey into an overall quality improvement program.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
