Abstract

BackgroundThe primary care system in the Republic of Korea has weakened over the past decade and is now in poorer condition than the systems in other countries. However, little is known about how the two key players, patients and physicians, view the current status of primary care in Korea. This study aims to understand what problems they perceive in respect to the key components of primary care.MethodsWe conducted two focus groups; one with six patients and the other with six physicians. We designed and modified the guidelines for each focus group discussion through repeated review and discussion among all authors and then we conducted the groups with a professional interviewer at Gallup Korea. After the focus groups we analyzed the verbatim transcriptions to identify specific meanings and potential implications.ResultsFrom the study we identified that the patients and physicians did not have a correct understanding about the role of primary care. We also identified a significant discrepancy between their perception of primary care. In particular, the patient group perceived the quality of primary care to be poor and unsatisfactory while the physician group perceived the quality of primary care to be better in Korea than in other countries.ConclusionsThe focus group discussions revealed that such discrepancies in perception have resulted from Korea’s distorted healthcare delivery system, undifferentiated roles among healthcare organizations, patients’ freedom of choice in selecting healthcare providers and other institutional factors. There are several steps that should be taken to promote primary care in Korea. First, we should undertake efforts to improve the quality of primary care provided by physicians. Second, we should inform the general public about using clinics instead of hospitals for the treatment of simple or minor diseases. Third, we should introduce a new compensation scheme to compensate physicians for services related to health education, disease prevention, behavioral change and nutrition consultation. Finally, we should provide additional reimbursement so that primary care physicians can extend their office hours to better meet the needs of patients.

Highlights

  • The primary care system in the Republic of Korea has weakened over the past decade and is in poorer condition than the systems in other countries

  • Because this study aimed to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the Korean primary care system based on the experience of key stakeholders, our guidelines included semi-structured questions based on the five key components of primary care – first contact, accessibility, coordination, comprehensiveness and continuity

  • In recruiting the potential participants, we considered their demographic characteristics to ensure a diversity of gender, age and prior experience with the primary care system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The primary care system in the Republic of Korea has weakened over the past decade and is in poorer condition than the systems in other countries. Little is known about how the two key players, patients and physicians, view the current status of primary care in Korea. Primary care plays an important role within healthcare delivery systems and influences the overall quality of care [1,2,3]. Primary care plays a significant role in the System failures account for most of the issues in Korea. Patients in Korea can choose any clinic or hospital without a referral slip [15]. If a patient wants to see a doctor in a hospital, he or she first consults a primary physician and receives a referral letter before going to the hospital. The relationship between clinics and hospitals can be viewed as collaborative

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call