Abstract
Practical examinations are necessary to demonstrate learning in the psychomotor, cognitive, and affective domains. Student perceptions of the organization and execution of practical examinations are an important consideration in the development of practical examinations. Multiple other health professions have investigated students' perceptions of objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE). There is little in the physical therapy literature with respect to student perception regarding proctor presence during practical examinations or OSCEs. The participants were members of the classes of 2019-2021 in a Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) program at a New England University. A qualitative thematic approach was applied to de-identified transcripts of student focus group interviews. Independently coded themes were identified, discussed, and refined iteratively. Four themes emerged with multiple subthemes: impact of proctor being present; realistic, patient-focused experience; preparation for the practical; and stress. Students valued preparation that included clear expectations, utilization of formative assessments, and peer feedback prior to the practical. They also noted that a distractive-free testing space, having no proctor present in the room, recording the practical, and the format of OSCE's decreased stress and improved performance. These findings add to the body of knowledge in physical therapy and provide guidance to faculty as they plan and organize practical examinations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.