Abstract

BackgroundDigital health devices, such as health and well-being smartphone apps, could offer an accessible and cost-effective way to deliver health and well-being interventions. A key component of the effectiveness of health and well-being apps is user engagement. However, engagement with health and well-being apps is typically poor. Previous studies have identified a list of factors that could influence engagement; however, most of these studies were conducted on a particular population or for an app targeting a particular behavior. An understanding of the factors that influence engagement with a wide range of health and well-being apps can inform the design and the development of more engaging apps in general.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to explore user experiences of and reasons for engaging and not engaging with a wide range of health and well-being apps.MethodsA sample of adults in the United Kingdom (N=17) interested in using a health or well-being app participated in a semistructured interview to explore experiences of engaging and not engaging with these apps. Participants were recruited via social media platforms. Data were analyzed with the framework approach, informed by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework, which are 2 widely used frameworks that incorporate a comprehensive set of behavioral influences.ResultsFactors that influence the capability of participants included available user guidance, statistical and health information, reduced cognitive load, well-designed reminders, self-monitoring features, features that help establish a routine, features that offer a safety net, and stepping-stone app characteristics. Tailoring, peer support, and embedded professional support were identified as important factors that enhance user opportunities for engagement with health and well-being apps. Feedback, rewards, encouragement, goal setting, action planning, self-confidence, and commitment were judged to be the motivation factors that affect engagement with health and well-being apps.ConclusionsMultiple factors were identified across all components of the COM-B model that may be valuable for the development of more engaging health and well-being apps. Engagement appears to be influenced primarily by features that provide user guidance, promote minimal cognitive load, support self-monitoring (capability), provide embedded social support (opportunity), and provide goal setting with action planning (motivation). This research provides recommendations for policy makers, industry, health care providers, and app developers for increasing effective engagement.

Highlights

  • Smoking, physical inactivity, inadequate diet, and excessive alcohol consumption are the main risk factors for noncommunicable diseases, responsible for over 56.9 million deaths worldwide [1]

  • We aimed to investigate people’s experiences and reasons for engaging or not engaging with health and wellbeing apps using qualitative interviews, and to map the identified factors onto the COM-B model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)

  • Ethical approval was obtained from the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ethics Committee at the University of East Anglia (Reference number: 201819 – 089)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Physical inactivity, inadequate diet, and excessive alcohol consumption are the main risk factors for noncommunicable diseases, responsible for over 56.9 million deaths worldwide [1]. Smartphone apps are constantly available to the user and act as portable tools for the delivery of accessible health and wellbeing interventions [4]. There is early evidence of effectiveness of apps for physical inactivity [5,6,7,8], weight loss [7,9,10], alcohol reduction in non-dependent drinkers [11] and mental health promotion [12]. Health apps are considered a cost-effective solution [7,13] and have the potential to increase access for hard-to-reach populations that are resistant or unable to seek face-to-face support, for instance due to stigma or geographical barriers [14]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call