Perceptions of a Plea Agreement in Cases of Teacher and Adolescent Student Sexual Assault

Abstract

ABSTRACT An estimated 90% of reported sexual abuse cases result in a plea agreement. The present study investigated the perception of plea agreements involving a teacher-adolescent student child sexual assault case. A 2 (teacher gender: male or female) x 2 (student gender: male or female) x 2 (punishment type: probation or jail) within-participant design was used with participant gender included as a between-participant factor. Perceptions of the plea agreement served as the dependent variables. Participants (N = 52; 48.1% male, 51.9% female) each read the eight vignettes in a random order and then rated their perceptions (e.g., support for the judicial process, degree of justice served, how upset they were by the plea) of a plea agreement on a 7-point scale. It was found that participants showed less support for plea agreements (1) offered to male teacher offenders compared to female teacher offenders and (2) when the punishment was probation compared to jail time. Additionally, participants’ emotional reactions (e.g., how upset) mediated the relationship between the independent variables (defendant gender and punishment type) and participants’ perception of the plea agreements. Results and implications are discussed in terms of procedural justice and the importance of public perceptions of pleas.