Abstract

This article reports on the PPI itself, its information, and language usage in the texts, as tested infocus-group sessions, using content analysis. Quantitative readability assessments of selectedPPIs revealed that the texts were mostly “difficult” or “very difficult”. However, readability relies notonly on text variables, but also on interaction between reader and text. From the findings, certainrecommendations are suggested to enhance the reader accessibility and cultural competenceof such documents. If PPIs, as a health communication tool, can be seen to be valuable andeasily comprehensible sources of medication information, they can fulfil a necessary role in healthliteracy, especially in a multicultural, developing country such as South Africa, one typified byhuge class differences and where more than two-thirds of its households fall within the lower- tomiddle-income groups.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.