Abstract

Quality improvement policies occupy a central place in higher education and represent important requirements for educational institutions in a globalized economy, and quality-related processes legitimacy is enhanced by the participation of academic community. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and validate a Spanish-language scale intended to assess perceptions about the accreditation process and the quality management in Higher Education Institutions. Based on prior findings, and using a one-time, cross-sectional design, 339 academics across four Chilean major academic cities were surveyed. Using structural equation modeling, two solutions with adequate fit indices were found: a four-factor solution comprised of Institutional relevance of accreditation, Objectivity of accreditation evaluation, Internal Quality Unit relevance for accreditation, Value of accreditation to educational system, as main constructs, and a six-factors solution, which included two additional constructs, i.e., Continuous Quality Management value and Students’ participation value.The questionnaire developed in our research allows higher education institutions to objectively assess and quantify the benefits of quality management and accreditation. Its results are particularly pertinent for countries with Spanish as an official language, taking into account the importance of internationalization of higher education.

Highlights

  • The need to clarify the effects of quality systems on educational institutions, in terms of empirical evidence of perceptions and attitudes about accreditation is increasingly relevant (Cardoso, Rosa, & Santos, 2013; Cardoso, Rosa, & Stensaker, 2015)

  • The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a Spanish-language scale intended to assess the perceptions about the accreditation process and the quality management in Higher Education Institutions

  • The present research aimed to build a scale regarding faculty perceptions with respect to accreditation and quality management processes in Latin‐American HEIs that have recently been through an accreditation process following the structure that combines self-evaluation, external peer evaluation and use of performance indicators (Ganga Contreras, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The need to clarify the effects of quality systems on educational institutions, in terms of empirical evidence of perceptions and attitudes about accreditation is increasingly relevant (Cardoso, Rosa, & Santos, 2013; Cardoso, Rosa, & Stensaker, 2015). Since there is not such a clear separation in the literature (Manatos, Sarrico, & Rosa, 2017), it is possible to assert that quality assurance consists of the existence of mechanisms, procedures and processes to ensure that a desired quality standard is achieved. To guarantee this quality and its improvement, quality assurance must be a cyclical process and must consider at least a measurement of educational quality, a judgment based on standards and an improvement based on priorities and plans. Quality assurance implies a strong component of accountability, testing against standards, and control (CNA-Chile, 2015: 4)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call