Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the mental workload of a harvester operator when working in late thinning and in windthrown stands of the same type and age, using eye movement patterns as an indicator. Eyeball movement variability was analysed using the eye tracking method. The mean duration of eyesight fixations in windthrown stands was shorter than in the control undamaged stands by about 20% (444 ms and 534 ms, respectively). The mean time of eyesight movements (saccades) in the windthrown stands was shorter than in the control undamaged stands by approx. 15%. The largest differences between the duration of saccades in the windthrown and control stands were observed between the cutting of trees and cutting logs off their root plates: the saccades were longer by about 20% when working in the control stands (49 ms) as compared to the windthrown stands (43 ms). Large differences in the duration of saccades between the windthrown area (42 ms) and the control area (47 ms) were also found when travelling between successive operation sites. In both types of stands, the shortest saccades were observed during processing: 39 ms. Summary durations of saccades observed during the processing of successive trees occurred in sequences showing repeated periods of variable eyeball activity, where longer saccades were followed by shorter ones. Documented more variability of eyesight activities of the harvester operator performing the operations of processing and moving is new standard of eye balls activities for the more taxing work conditions presented by windthrown stands.

Highlights

  • Catastrophic wind damage occurred long before the beginning of human interference in natural forest ecosystems

  • Conducted with the eye tracking method, an analysis of the visual information reaching harvester operators can help probing the cognitive strain experienced under variable conditions

  • Comparing the duration and the variability of eyesight fixations and saccades may enable a fair assessment of the cognitive workload imposed on a harvester operator by work in damaged and undamaged stands

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Catastrophic wind damage occurred long before the beginning of human interference in natural forest ecosystems. There is a huge diversity in the forms of wind damage, all hiding some danger: lifted root plates that may fall on the operators once severed from the stems, bent tree trunks that may snap suddenly and unpredictably when crosscut, broken trees leaning over other standing trees Such exceptionally dangerous working conditions discourage motor-manual work, since chainsaw operators are fully exposed, with minimal protection [14]. By placing the operator inside a protected cab at a safe distance from the cut zone, the number and the severity of accidents recorded during timber harvesting in post-disaster areas has been reduced significantly [22,23,24]. The goal of this study was to gauge the mental workload experienced by harvester operators working in post-disaster areas and compare its level and variability with those experienced during conventional planned operations in undamaged stands of the same type and age

Methods
Disaster the Solarnia
GHz band
Results and approx
(Figures
11. Sequence saccades
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call