Perception of temporally enhanced and hearing aid processed speech in children with late-onset Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate phrase perception and subjective quality preference of temporal enhancement-based speech processing strategies: Deep-band modulation and Stretching, and hearing aid processed speech in adolescents with late-onset Auditory Neuropathy. Methods15 participants with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder were involved. Speech perception was assessed using unprocessed, deep-band modulated, stretched, and hearing aid processed conditions. Subjective preference was also assessed using the pair-wise comparison technique. Gap detection test was done using broadband noise to investigate the possible correlation with benefit from processing strategies. ResultsAs a group, no significant benefits were found with processed speech. Clinically relevant trends emerged on subdividing the group into good and poor performers. Deep-band modulation processing was significantly better than unprocessed speech in those with poorer speech recognition abilities. There was a trend for those with poorer temporal processing abilities to benefit more with deep-band modulation processing. In those with relatively better speech recognition abilities, processing showed no benefit, and hearing aid processed speech was inferior to unprocessed speech. Quality-wise, the unprocessed speech was preferred by all the participants. Among the processed conditions, deep-band modulation was preferred by most, followed by stretching and hearing aid processed speech. ConclusionResults indicate that temporal enhancement strategies may be beneficial for a subset of individuals with ANSD with poorer temporal processing and speech perception abilities. However, processing strategies need to take into account the quality aspect and not just intelligibility.