Abstract
The value of overall and differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE)is discussed in the context of assessing working capacity and regulating the intensity of effort to avoid injury. Information is drawn from studies in both industrial and therapeutic settings. The average RPE at any given fraction of a task-specific peak power outputs is surrisingly consistent across a range of variables, including age, sex, muscle mass, environmental conditions other than heat and sleep deprivation, drugs and disease. However, the practical value of RPE, either in assessing the physical condition of an individual worker or in regulating the intensity of that individual's effort is limited by a large inter-individual variation in reported perceptions, and a substantial impact of cognitive factors in manual lifting tasks. Greater consistency of ratings might be possible with a deliberate learning of procedures. Combined assessments based on heart and RPE could also improve precision. However, the main value of the RPE will probably remain the classifying of industrial tasks, and the fine-tuning of an individual's intensity of effort that has already been established by some other method such as the timed completion of a known task.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.