Abstract

BackgroundTuberculosis case management has undergone various changes in recent years. Most of the decisions have been taken based on provider intelligence or perspective. It is essential to know the beneficiary perspective about the changes in RNTCP. DOTS providers are active witnesses for the series of changes and they have first hand experience of effect of these changes on TB patients. Thus it is ideal to learn from DOTS providers, about comparative strengths and limitations of the new strategy and effects of the changes. MethodsStudy design Mixed method using survey and matrix ranking method. Study populationDOTS providers who have supervised at least one patient before the daily regimen and completed at-least intensive phase of one patient in daily regimen.Study was conducted in Mandya district between May–June 2019 involving 25 DOTS providers selected through snowball sampling technique. Data collection was done using proforma and Matrix ranking technique using 10 stones. Thematic analysis, wilcoxon sign rank test were used for analysis. ResultsSignificant improvement was reported by DOTS providers in new regimen with respect to compliance, treatment response, ease of supervision and patient attitude towards outcome. Related to drug supply system, there was no significant difference. ConclusionsThere was significant improvement in compliance, response, ease of supervision and patient attitude. Significant reduction in side effects in daily regimen compared to alternate day regimen. NPY is helping poor and elderly patients but irregular payment is an issue. Remuneration of DOTS providers was not consistent.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.