Abstract

The current study investigates perception of New Zealand English /r/‐sandhi by speakers of Western Canadian English. It investigates whether speakers of Western Canadian English can differentiate between intrusive‐/r/ (e.g., sawing [saeoɹəŋ]) and linking‐/r/ (e.g., soaring [saeoɹəŋ]) of /r/‐sandhi across morpheme boundaries and across word boundaries (e.g., linking: boar and, intrusive: boa and). Reaction time and accuracy were recorded in a two‐alternative forced choice experiment. Stimuli showed significant acoustic differences between the linking‐/r/ and intrusive‐/r/ environments, with intrusive‐/r/ having a shorter duration than linking‐/r/. Participants were highly accurate and faster at recognizing words with linking‐/r/ (e.g., soaring) and extremely inaccurate and slower at recognizing intrusive‐/r/ (e.g., sawing). Participants’ responses to linking‐/r/ at a morpheme boundary were significantly more accurate and faster than responses with linking‐/r/ across word boundaries. The results of this experiment address the phonetic variability present in cross‐dialect perception and begin to investigate strategies listeners utilize to accurately perceive speech.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call