Abstract

“Percentage Tax Designation Institutions”, also known as “Percentage Philanthropy Laws”, are fiscal institutions through which taxpayers can freely designate a certain percentage of their income tax to organizations whose main activity is of public interest: churches, third-sector organizations, political parties, etc. A comprehensive explanation of such systems is still lacking. In The Community of Advantage, Robert Sugden provides an original theoretical account of the Italian “8 × 1000” institution as one of those forms of regulation that “would be justified as ways of expanding opportunity for mutually beneficial transactions” and, more particularly, as a liberal and “contractarian approach to the provision of public goods”. This article is an attempt to expand and deepen the understanding not only of the 8 × 1000 but also of the 5 × 1000 and 2 × 1000 institutions, by reflecting on and possibly refining Sugden’s contractarian account, at least with regard to the part that relies on and develops the voluntary exchange tradition (Wicksell, Lindahl and Buchanan). To remain faithful to two normative premises of Sugden’s approach—the opportunity criterion and the correlated freedom of choice—we must introduce some theoretical adjustments to take into due account the way in which taxpayers’ freedoms—not only freedom of choice but also autonomy—are affected by default rules and the related redistribution procedures. In addition, these institutions also go beyond the voluntary exchange tradition—insofar as they go beyond its basic assumptions: the benefit principle of taxation, taxpayers’ self-interest and the very logic of exchange—and, at the same time, they can be read as a new form of voluntary tax justice.

Highlights

  • “We should have the courage to say that taxes are a beautiful thing

  • The 8 × 1000: 1. “illustrates the logic of a contractarian approach to the provision of public goods” (171); 2. “could usefully be adapted to many cases in which there is divergence in people’s beliefs about which kinds of public goods are valuable and which are not” (171); 3. presents a very interesting aspect “from a contractarian viewpoint: [...]: each taxpayer can choose which fund on the list will receive her 0.8 per cent” (172); 4. “provides a rough and ready response to the free-rider and hold-out problems” (172); 5. “is a rough and ready way of ensuring that people contribute to the costs of only those public goods that they value” (172)

  • With regard to these two different mechanisms for redistributing the expressed choices, one would think that a gap, if not a conflict, opens up between the two guiding principles of Sugden’s approach: on the one hand, the principle of proportional spending based on the analogy with the proportional voting mechanism; on the other hand, the tradition of voluntary exchange, which instead moves from the principle of tax justice known as the benefit principle

Read more

Summary

Introduction: “le tasse sono una cosa bellissima”?

“We should have the courage to say that taxes are a beautiful thing. It is a very civilized way of contributing all together to the payment of essential [public] goods like education, safety, healthcare and the environment.” In 2007, the Italian Minister of Economy and Finance, Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa (1940–2010), made this claim on a national TV show. The 5 × 1000 was introduced as an institution aimed at implementing the constitutional principle of horizontal subsidiarity and as a way, via taxpayers’ designations, to channel funding to third-sector organizations and other entities providing public goods or services Even though these institutions have been in place for many years, few scientific studies have attempted to provide a conceptual and explanatory framework capable of casting light on their theoretical and practical potential.. Theoretical account of the Italian 8 × 1000 in line with, and further improving, the paradigm of “voluntary exchange” (Wicksell 1896/1958; Lindahl 1919/1958; Buchanan 1968).3 This particular tax institution is explained by Sugden (xi) as one of those forms of regulation that “would be justified as ways of expanding opportunity for mutually beneficial transactions” and, more as a liberal and “contractarian approach to the provision of public goods” (171).

The Italian percentage tax designation institutions
Basic facts
Sugden’s contractarian account
Public goods
Bettering the voluntary exchange paradigm
Considering some objections and improving Sugden’s account
Taxpayers’ freedom: autonomy and choice
Expressed choices
On the analogy with voting
Non‐expressed choices
Conclusions
Findings
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call