Abstract

It is well known that motion facilitates the visual perception of solid object shape, particularly when surface texture or other identifiable features (e.g., corners) are present. Conventional models of structure-from-motion require the presence of texture or identifiable object features in order to recover 3-D structure. Is the facilitation in 3-D shape perception similar in magnitude when surface texture is absent? On any given trial in the current experiments, participants were presented with a single randomly-selected solid object (bell pepper or randomly-shaped “glaven”) for 12 seconds and were required to indicate which of 12 (for bell peppers) or 8 (for glavens) simultaneously visible objects possessed the same shape. The initial single object’s shape was defined either by boundary contours alone (i.e., presented as a silhouette), specular highlights alone, specular highlights combined with boundary contours, or texture. In addition, there was a haptic condition: in this condition, the participants haptically explored with both hands (but could not see) the initial single object for 12 seconds; they then performed the same shape-matching task used in the visual conditions. For both the visual and haptic conditions, motion (rotation in depth or active object manipulation) was present in half of the trials and was not present for the remaining trials. The effect of motion was quantitatively similar for all of the visual and haptic conditions–e.g., the participants’ performance in Experiment 1 was 93.5 percent higher in the motion or active haptic manipulation conditions (when compared to the static conditions). The current results demonstrate that deforming specular highlights or boundary contours facilitate 3-D shape perception as much as the motion of objects that possess texture. The current results also indicate that the improvement with motion that occurs for haptics is similar in magnitude to that which occurs for vision.

Highlights

  • [1] Charles Wheatstone expressed his view that relative motion between environmental objects and human observers produced as good a perception of solid object shape as that that occurs during binocular stereopsis

  • The objects were optically presented to the participants 1) as silhouettes, 2) by specular highlights, 3) by specular highlights combined with boundary contours, and 4) by boundary contours combined with solid/volumetric texture

  • Our current results demonstrate that the magnitude of the kinetic depth effect is as strong for stimulus objects defined only by specular highlights as for objects that are defined by surface texture: the participants’ object identification performance for the stimulus displays containing specular highlights improved with motion by 108.7 and 185.4 percent for the glavens and bell peppers, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One hundred and seventy-eight years ago [1] Charles Wheatstone expressed his view that relative motion between environmental objects and human observers produced as good a perception of solid object shape as that that occurs during binocular stereopsis. Later researchers [4,5,6,7,8,9] extended these investigations of the kinetic depth effect in human observers using computer-generated patterns and motion sequences. In such investigations, the perception of 3-D structure was enabled by the projected motions of trackable features, such as random dots or surface texture

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call