Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article presents a developmental ecological approach to the emergence and development of metaphor in children, based on the ecological psychology tradition following the work of J.J. Gibson, and its extension into developmental research and theory, as developed by E.J. Gibson and others. This framework suggests that a basic compatibility and meaningfulness exists between the knower and the known, based on the direct perception of affordances. To build an ecological understanding of metaphor we need to clarify how this metaphysical ground plays out in acts of knowing that involve metaphor. In this endeavor, it is important to understand the ontogenesis of novel insightful metaphors and the role of perception. Developmental ecological psychology has repeatedly shown that infants can perceive meta-modal invariants that specify persistence of qualities. Early metaphors are consequences of the process in which invariants over naturally occurring kinds are perceived. Thus, novel metaphor production is an act of situated and experience-dependent perceiving and acting in the ecological world of socially shared meanings. Examples from previous experimental and qualitative research are reviewed to substantiate theoretical claims.

Highlights

  • The 4 Es and the ecological “E”Recent changes in cognitive science have come to be characterized as the “E-turn,” marked by the “4 Es,” which claim that cognition is embodied, embedded, enacted, and extended

  • This framework suggests that a basic compatibility and meaningfulness exists between the knower and the known, based on the direct perception of affordances

  • Developmental ecological psychology has repeatedly shown that infants can perceive meta-modal invariants that specify persistence of qualities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent changes in cognitive science have come to be characterized as the “E-turn,” marked by the “4 Es,” which claim that cognition is embodied, embedded, enacted, and extended (see, e.g., Chemero, 2011; Gallagher, 2017; Menary, 2010; Newen, De Bruin, & Gallagher, 2018; Noë, 2009; Thompson, 2007). These terms refer to differing aspects of the the general idea that cognition is shaped and structured by dynamic interactions between the brain, body, and the physical and social environment. The existence of the organism is grounded in a ceaseless flow of matter and energy exchange with its surroundings, which grounds persistence of its identity as a whole

SZOKOLSZKY
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call