Perceived timing of postural instability onset

Abstract

BackgroundThis study investigates the perceived onset of postural instability, a critical aspect of balance. Prior research using Temporal Order Judgment (TOJ) tasks revealed that postural perturbations must occur significantly earlier than an auditory reference stimulus for individuals to perceive them as simultaneous. However, there are methodological concerns with this previous work, particularly an unbalanced stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) distribution. Research questionDoes the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) between postural perturbation onset and an auditory reference stimulus differ between SOA distributions unequally (distribution 1) and equally (distribution 2) distributed around true simultaneity (0 ms)? MethodsA repeated measures design was employed, presenting two different SOA distributions to 10 participants using a TOJ task during both distribution 1 (88 trials) and distribution 2 (72 trials) SOA distributions. Paired t-tests were used to determine if there was a significant difference between the PSS of distribution 1 and 2. One-sample t-tests were also performed on the PSS values of both conditions in comparison to 0 ms (defined as true simultaneity) to determine if perceptual responses were delayed. ResultsDistribution 1 led to a perceived delay of postural instability onset by 20.34 ms, while distribution 2 resulted in a perceived delay of the auditory stimulus of 3.52 ms. However, neither condition was significantly different from each other nor from true simultaneity. SignificanceThese findings suggest that the perception of postural instability onset is not slow, contrary to previous beliefs, and emphasize the importance of controlling methodological parameters when examining sensory cues. This understanding will help inform falls prevention strategies.