Abstract
Theory and evidence proposing illumination, and therefore necessarily angle of incidence of light, as a perceptual cue for lightness judgments are described. In two experiments, angle of incidence was varied by having 46 Ss view an upright trapezoid that monocularly appeared flat and binocularly, upright. In the first experiment, numbers of cues to the direction of a fixed source above the trapezoid were varied and combined. In a second experiment, the background for an illumination gradient was varied. Angle of incidence and cues to the location of the source did predict the trends in lightness judgments but not the magnitude of the effects. An alternative explanation to cue theory is proposed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
