Abstract

AbstractIn response priming, motor pre-activations from a prime to the response to a target can be measured, as a function of whether they require the same (compatible) or different (incompatible) responses. With moving primes and static arrow targets, the results depend on the stimulus onset asynchrony between prime and target: with short SOAs, there were faster responses to compatible than incompatible targets, with longer SOAs, the pattern reverses. However, this reversal was not found with more biological motions. The current study comprised 3 experiments in order to replicate several findings from previous research and add evidence regarding the interplay of one’s own and perceived motions. Subjects performed a response priming task with moving prime stimuli while in motion themselves. With this paradigm, we tested the general influence of motion on responding and compatibility effects in response priming with moving prime stimuli. Furthermore, we assessed specific interactions of features of the perceived stimuli (e.g., moving vs. static; direction of the prime or target) and the own motion (e.g., walking vs. standing; direction of being rotated). We used two different own motions (walking on a treadmill, Exp. 1 & 3; rotating in a human gyroscope, Exp. 2) and two different visual stimulus types (rows-of-dots, Exp. 1 & 2; point light displays, Exp. 3). Compatibility effects were, in general, neither increased nor decreased during motion. Their size depended on the stimulus type, the velocity of one’s own motion, and several interactions of perceived and own motion. We discuss our findings with respect to perception-action interactions and previous findings on response priming with moving prime stimuli.

Highlights

  • A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) on mean RTs was performed with the factors Own motion, stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) (147, 360 ms; within subjects), Prime moving primes static primes response times error rates

  • If necessary, the F, p, and ηp2 – values were corrected in all following ANOVAs according to the Greenhouse-Geisser method

  • We were able to replicate some of the most important findings regarding the pattern of compatibility effects as found in experiments without an own motion of the subjects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Much of the most valuable information we need to process is constantly moving. Motion frequently signals an event worthy of our attention. Our perceptual systems have been selected and tuned to respond to motion. It is not just our external environment that is moving, but we are constantly moving through the world. How humans respond and act appropriately to stimuli in the world, and, in turn, how perception and action interact, are some of the most interesting and essential questions in psychology

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call