Abstract

There are complex and interrelated factors that lead to inequitable healthcare delivery in Canada. Many of the factors that underlie these inequities for Canada's geographically dispersed Indigenous Peoples remain underexamined. A cohort of 831 First Nations (FN) individuals from urban and remote communities were recruited into a longitudinal study of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) risk from 2005-2017. Data from each participant's initial enrollment visit was assessed using a survey that captured concerns with health care access. We found that remote participants with RA reported poor access compared to remote First-Degree Relatives (FDR, p<0.001), this difference was not observed for urban RA participants. We observed substantial differences based on sex; Females perceived access to care to be more difficult than males in both urban and remote cohorts (p<0.001). We also observed that male participants with RA reported poor access to care compared to male FDR. Importantly, access to care in remote communities appeared to improve over the duration of the study (p=0.01). In a logistic regression analysis, female sex, remote location, and older age were independent predictors of poor access to care. Predictors of poor access in participants with RA were also female sex, remote location and older age. FN peoples living in remote communities, particularly those with an established RA diagnosis, report more problems accessing healthcare. Sex-based inequities exist, with FN females reporting greater difficulties in accessing appropriate healthcare, irrespective of RA diagnosis. Addressing these sex-based inequities should be a high priority for improving healthcare delivery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call