Abstract

proof is the process of discovering the truth of a legal relationship and theexistence of a concrete legal event has actually taken place. The judge as the mainexecutor of the judiciary to uphold law and justice in addition to basing on theprovisions of material law which is the basis of dispute, is also bound to implementthe provisions of formal law which is also substantive, so it is obliged to conductinvestigation on the evidences presented by the parties. The process ofinvestigating the evidence that strengthens the arguments or arguments of the law,something that can convince the truth of a proposition or establishment. While theevidence is anything that the law can use to prove it. The evidence that can be usedin proof depends on the system of evidence held by both the legal system and thelegal system it embraces. Thus, the proofing process as a decisive essential processfor the justice seekers fulfilled their legal interests and for judges is to find, enforceand apply the law justly to the justice seeker's justice. Implementing the correctproof process according to material law and formal law will help the judge toformulate a legal opinion or legal consideration (ratio desidendi) to determine theattitude or legal standing to decide or sentence a case.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.