Abstract
There is a need to conduct business transactions rapidly and in a quick perfunctory manner. At the same time arose also the need to develop and implement a quick, simple and cost efficient business dispute settlement procedure. In response to this need, the Indonesian Supreme Court issued regulation no. 2 of 2015 re. procedure for filing simple civil claims. The legal issue to be discussed here, using a juridical normative or dogmatic approach, is whether this regulation succeed in fulfilling its promise to provide for a quick, simple and cost efficient civil claim examination procedure? The answer to this question is sought, in addition to the method mentioned above, by comparing the procedure provided by the Supreme Court regulation with the existing model of civil claim court examination procedure. By virtue of this comparison the strength and weakness of the Supreme Court dispute settlement model can be analyzed.
Highlights
Abstrak Sekarang ini muncul kebutuhan untuk melakukan transaksi bisnis dengan cara cepat dan cermat
whether this regulation succeed in fulfilling its promise to provide for a quick
by comparing the procedure provided by the Supreme Court regulation with the existing model
Summary
Abstrak Sekarang ini muncul kebutuhan untuk melakukan transaksi bisnis dengan cara cepat dan cermat. Sekaligus muncul kebutuhan untuk mengembangkan dan menerapkan prosedur dan model penyelesaian sengketa bisnis yang cepat, sederhana dan murah. Mahkamah Agung menerbitkan PerMa Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Gugatan Sederhana.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
