Abstract
In People v. Zondorak, California’s “assault weapon” ban was challenged as violative of the 2nd Amendment. The Zondorak court found, however, that California’s ban was constitutional and in doing so gutted the holding of Heller by using a test that was not part of Heller and that contradicts the basis of the Heller decision.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
