Abstract
The article proves the necessity of implementing socio-humanitarian technologies during ongoing global geopolitical instability. Modern people’s diplomacy is defined as information and communication technology with new qualitative characteristics. The authors (1) provide a definition of people’s diplomacy as a social and humanitarian phenomenon with a range of distinctive characteristics, that differentiates it from public diplomacy or, in particular, cultural diplomacy, and identify the types of public diplomacy and its potential. General theoretical calculations are applied to the relations of Western countries and Ukraine to Russia and Crimea after reunification. Based on the analysis of the modern agenda of discussing the Crimean case in the practice of such international organizations as the UN and the OSCE, the authors raise the question of changing the agenda from interstate to humanitarian. Within the study the authors highlight the scientific type of people’s diplomacy, the attention is focused on the role and opportunities of the international scientific community in the peaceful settlement of the humanitarian problems.
Highlights
The authors (1) provide a definition of people’s diplomacy as a social and humanitarian phenomenon with a range of distinctive characteristics, that differentiates it from public diplomacy or, in particular, cultural diplomacy, and identify the types of public diplomacy and its potential
General theoretical calculations are applied to the relations of Western countries and Ukraine to Russia and Crimea after reunification
Based on the analysis of the modern agenda of discussing the Crimean case in the practice of such international organizations as the UN and the OSCE, the authors raise the question of changing the agenda from interstate to humanitarian
Summary
В этом крымском кейсе выделяется такой вид народной дипломатии, как научная, то есть роль и возможности международного научного сообщества в мирном решении возникших гуманитарных проблем. Фокус нашего внимания будет сосредоточен на такой социально-гуманитарной технологии, как народная дипломатия. Но при этом недостаточно внимания уделялось технологическим вопросам, а тем более методическим, то есть технологии не доводились до потребительского состояния, как это можно наблюдать в западной академической и практико-ориентированной литературе (Melissen 2005(a); 2005(b); Zartman and Rasmussen 1996; Nossel 2004).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
