Abstract
Whether following disasters or extended periods of civil conflict and war, the development industry views reconstruction as a window of opportunity within which to affect otherwise deeply unpopular reforms in the name of market-driven reconstruction and improvement. Critics, who emphasize the pain that neoliberal reconstruction entails, even as it often fails, term such projects “disaster capitalism.” This article examines the institutional priorities and urban vision of two post-conflict reconstruction projects in Beirut, Lebanon. The first, undertaken by a private real estate holding company in the 1990s, was part of a radical experiment in market-driven reconstruction but closely approximates disaster capitalism. The second, undertaken by a nonprofit NGO, presented itself as an alternative approach that prioritized people over profit and sought to return residents to their pre-war communities. The contrast and connections between the two offer useful lessons for future instances of post-trauma reconstr...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.