Abstract

We use a large sample of private sponsors’ defined benefit pension plans to document economically significant differences in the magnitude of plan return volatility for private versus publicly-traded sponsors. The main drivers of pension plan risk taking are different for public and private firms. The impact of the funded status of pension liabilities on volatility for publicly-traded sponsors is more than two times higher than for private sponsors. The impact of sponsor contributions for private sponsors is more than four times higher than for public sponsors. The results suggest that the alignment of the incentives of owners and plan beneficiaries is different for private versus publicly-traded sponsors.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.