Abstract
The function of the symbolic oedipal third party is undergoing an unprecedented fragilisation. This is to be heard in consultations as a disorder in relationships, poorly differentiated genealogical places, a lack or a fragilisation of the paternal function. The deeper reasons for this are to be sought not in the way the concrete and social fathers assume their paternity, but in what institutes fathers and paternal filiations. Three historical breaks have over the last hundred years dislocated the field of paternity. The anthropological and subjective issues at stake in these dislocations are specific in each case. Whence the question: what new logic of the paternal's place? Who secure today the function of the symbolic oedipal third party between the child and his mother?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
