Abstract
The notary is obliged to keep all legal deeds outlined in the contents of the deed and all information given to the notary in making the deed. the appointment of a notary as a witness in a case causes the violation of this obligation to be violated a lot. Strong legal protection is needed from the Honorary Board of Notaries (MKN) so that investigators and prosecutors are not arbitrary. The formulation of the problem taken by the author is the normalization of notary liability based on UUJN. And the application of sanctions from the notary obligation in the community.The writing of this thesis uses a normative juridical research method, namely by reviewing the legal norms contained in legislation, legal theories and jurisprudence related to the issues discussed. This research approach uses a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The purpose of this study is to explain more deeply about the norms of denial obligations in the UUJN and their application in the community with the existence of permission from MKN. Based on the results of the study, the author obtained answers to existing problems, namely the notary has a broken obligation that must be obeyed and regulated in Article 4 paragraph (2) and Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f UUJN-P. This breach obligation has a limit set out in UUJN in Article 66 paragraph (1) concerning a notary appointed as a witness can talk about the deed with the approval of the permit from MKN. But it also needs to be known if the broken obligation is violated without permission, the notary may be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of termination of employment, civil sanctions in the form of compensation and criminal sanctions in the form of prison sentences.
Highlights
Article 4 paragraph (2) and Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f UUJN-P. This breach obligation has a limit set out in UUJN in Article 66 paragraph (1) concerning a notary appointed as a witness can talk about the deed with the approval of the permit from MKN
It needs to be known if the broken obligation is violated without permission, the notary may be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of termination of employment, civil sanctions in the form of compensation and criminal sanctions in the form of prison sentences
Pidana Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik, Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah, Surakarta
Summary
Qonitah Annur Aziza, Aprilia Trisanti, Kiki Aristyanti Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga. Ditunjuknya notaris menjadi saksi dalam suatu perkara menyebabkan kewajiban ingkar ini banyak dilanggar. Dan penerapan juga sanksi dari kewajiban ingkar notaris dalam masyarakat.Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menjelaskan lebih dalam mengenai norma-norma kewajiban ingkar dalam UUJN dan penerapannya dalam masyarakat dengan adanya izin dari MKN.Penulisan jurnal ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu dengan mengkaji norma-norma hukum yang ada dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, teori-teori hukum dan yurisprudensi yang berhubungan dengan permasalahan yang dibahas. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, penulis memperoleh jawaban atas permasalahan yang ada, yaitu notaris memiliki kewajiban ingkar yang harus ditaati dan diatur dalam Pasal 4 ayat (2) dan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f UUJN-P. Kewajiban ingkar ini memiliki batasan yang diatur dalam UUJN pada Pasal 66 ayat (1) mengenai notaris yang ditunjuk menjadi saksi dapat berbicara tetang aktanya dengan adanya persetujuan izin dari MKN.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
