Penile fractures: controversy of surgical vs. conservative treatment

Abstract

This paper reviews the current status of information on diagnostic and therapeutic management of penile fractures, focusing on the controversy between surgical vs. conservative treatment of this uncommon injury. Penile fracture, commonly defined as a rupture of the tunica albuginea and corpus cavernosum, is a serious urological disorder demanding surgical management. The diagnostic procedure classically consists of history taking, physical examination and urinary status. Determination of the extent of severity and location of the rupture in the tunica albuginea takes foremost priority and requires additional imaging procedures, such as ultrasound or cavernosography, which will impart enough diagnostic information for the correct choice of treatment. In some cases, the urethra is injured as well. Immediate surgical repair offers complete recovery for patients with penile fracture in most cases, even in the presence of urethral injury. Although penile fracture is easily recognized and can therefore be classified as a "first-look diagnosis", therapy remains controversial to date. The correct therapeutical approach is a vital factor in management, as the associated significant morbidity can result in complete loss of erectile function, painful erections or penis deviation. Early surgical treatment is strongly recommended because of the excellent results, shorter hospitalization, less morbidity and an early return to sexual activity.