Abstract

Objective: To compare the long-term results and complications of minimally invasive H-incision complete burying-knot technique and modified Nesbit procedure in penile curvature surgery. Material and Methods: The data of 53 patients who underwent penile curvature surgery in our clinic for Peyronie's disease were retrospectively analyzed. While 27 (50.9%) of the patients had excisional modified Nesbit procedure (Group 1), 26 (49.1%) were applied minimally invasive H-incision complete burying-knot technique (Group 2). The postoperative results and complications of the groups were compared. Results: The mean age of groups was similar (p=0.369). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of mean operating times (Group 1=41.92±6.93 minute vs Group 2=43.14±6.81 minute, p=0.520). The mean postoperative penile shorthening was 1.07±1.77 cm in Group 1, while it was 0.84±1.59 cm in Group 2 (p=0.625). Mean postoperative palpable suture knots, penile pain and penile numbness were found to be significantly lower in Group 2 (p=0.011, p=0.005, p=0.011 respectively). The mean postoperative International Index of Erectile Function scores were similar in both groups (Group 1=20.14±1.58 vs Group 2=19.73±1.84, p=0.249). Conclusion: Minimally invasive H-incision complete burying-knot technique provides similar success rates with lower postoperative complication compared to the modified Nesbit procedure in penile curvature surgery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call