Abstract
Article 53 of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration (Law 30/2014) does not provide an explanation of the criteria for positive fictitious decisions/actions of Government Agencies and/or Officials, but rather authorizing the State Administrative Court to review the reports on positive fictitious decisions/actions. As a form of expansion of the object of disputes in the State Administrative Court, positive fictitious decisions/actions require in-depth study considering there are obstacles in their implementation as well as the review at the State Administrative Court. This writing intends to determine the criteria for positive fictitious action of Government Agencies and/or Officials and to find out how to test positive fictitious decisions / actions by the State Administrative Court. This is a normative legal research, in which the results indicate, first, the criteria for positive fictitious decisions/actions can be identified by exploring the principal elements in Law 30/2014 and in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 8 of 2017. Second, the examination of positive fictitious decisions/actions is by using applicable laws and regulations and general principles of good governance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.