Abstract
This research develop the models of agency conflict with positioning of managerial ownership as intervening variable among dividend policy, debt policy and institutional ownership toward risk taking. Path analysis is used for running of 60 sample for manufacture companies that listed at Jakarta Stock Exchange in 1995-1996. Results indicate that managerial ownership has significant positive influence to risk taking, debt policy and institutional have significant negative influence to managerial ownership. So this mechanism can use as control device to mitigate the agency conflict. Inverse, result find that dividend policy is positive and significant to managerial ownership consequently, this mechanism can not mitigate the agency conflict. Finally results show that managerial ownership intervene the influence among debt policy and institutional ownership to risk talcing. Manager's decision must be focused to control the agency conflict for increasing value of the firm and stockholder's wealth fare.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
