Abstract
This research aims to find out two matters. the first matter is to find out how the paradigm of Law Number 5 Year 1986 and Law Number 30 Year 2014 on decisions that are petitioned to State Administrative Officials (hereinafter TUN Officials). Second, to find out the legal implications of the differences in the position of decisions that are applied to TUN Officials based on Law Number 5 Year 1986 and Law Number 30 Year 2014. The following research results, (1) that related to the paradigm of Article 3 of the Law on State Administrative Court and Article 53 of the Government Administration Law, should be related to the type of decision.. (2) The legal implication of the decision’s differences that have been petitioned to TUN officials may allow confusion to occur when it is applied in the process of administering the government and also the process in court.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
