Abstract

Judgment audit is a consideration made by public accountants in making an audit plan, and before issuing an opinion on the company's financial statements. The independent variables of this study are skepticism, auditor experience, and self efficacy. The dependent variable of this study is judgment audit. The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the influence of skepticism, auditor experience, and self efficacy on judgment audits at the Public Accountant Office in Medan. This research uses descriptive quantitative research methods with the nature of research of causal relationships. The data were collected with questionnaires which were tested for validity and reliability before conducting the research. The test equipment used is normality test, multicollinearity test, and heteroscedasticity test. This study uses purposive sampling with a total of 90 respondents in the Public Accountant Office in Medan. The results of the study on the hypothesis indicate that skepticism, auditor experience, and self efficacy partially and simultaneously influence the judgment audit on the Public Accounting Firm in Medan. The conclusion of this study shows that skepticism, auditor experience, and self-efficacy have a positive and significant effect on judgment audits at the Public Accountant Office in Medan.Keywords: Skepticism, Auditor Experience, Self Efficacy, Audit Judgment

Highlights

  • Judgment audit is a consideration made by public accountants in making an audit plan, and before issuing an opinion on the company's financial statements

  • The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the influence of skepticism, auditor experience, and self efficacy on judgment audits at the Public Accountant Office in Medan

  • This study uses purposive sampling with a total of 90 respondents in the Public Accountant Office in Medan

Read more

Summary

EY Indonesia dalam pembuatan audit judgement seperti memberikan opini Wajar

Tanpa Pengecualian (WTP) dikarenakan auditor yang bertanggung jawab perlu meningkatkan sikap skeptismenya, sehingga auditor lebih kritis dan waspada disaat melaksanakan pemeriksaan audit. Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas, maka peneliti merumuskan masalah sebagai berikut: 1) bagaimana pengaruh skeptisme terhadap audit judgement pada Kantor. Akuntan Publik di Medan; 2) bagaimana pengaruh pengalaman auditor terhadap audit judgement pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di. Bagaimana pengaruh skeptisme, pengalaman auditor, dan self efficacy terhadap audit judgement pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: 1) menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh skeptisme terhadap audit judgement pada. Kantor Akuntan Publik di Medan; 2) menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh pengalaman auditor terhadap audit judgement pada. Kantor Akuntan Publik di Medan; 3) menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh self efficacy terhadap audit judgement pada Kantor. Akuntan Publik di Medan; dan 4) menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh skeptisme, pengalaman auditor, dan self efficacy terhadap audit judgement pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Medan

Landasan Teori Teori Skeptisme
Pengaruh Skeptisme Terhadap Audit Judgement
Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgement
Pengaruh Self Efficacy Terhadap Audit Judgement
Metode Penelitian Penelitian ini dilakukan pada Kantor
Uji validitas dan Reliabilitas Uji Validitas
Keterangan Valid Valid Valid Valid
Hasil Dan Pembahasan Statistik Deskriptif
Hasil Uji Asumsi Klasik Uji Normalitas
Absolute Positive Negative
Collinearity Statistics
Uji Heteroskedastisitas
Coefficients t
Standardized Coefficients
Adjusted R Square
Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F
Unstandardized Coefficients
Daftar Pustaka
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call