Abstract

The influence of the use of mind mapping learning model and spatial intelligenceon the leaning outcomes of Indonesian history. This study aims to examine the differences inIndonesian historical learning using mind mapping learning model is superior to the lecturelearning model, This research is using experimental method. The target population of allstudents of class X SMK Kary Guna Bhakti 1 in the city of Bekasi. Samples taken with multistage random sampling technique. With this technique, two classes were taken for researchactivities, namely class 10C as experimental class and 10A as control class, from each classof 36 students. Techniques of data retrieval analysis using descriptive and inferential analysisof two-track ANAVA to test the hypothesis followed by Tukey or Schffe test. Testing ofstatistic prerequisite includes testing normality with kolmogorof smirnof and homogeneitytesting using anova one way. The results of statistical tests show that the data of the threevariables are normal and homogeneous. The results show that: first, the difference oflearning history of Indonesia by using mind mapping learning model is more superior thanlecture learning model. Second, there is the influence of learning model interaction withspatial intelligence to the learning result of Indonesian history. Thirdly, there are differencesin Indonesian historical learning outcomes between groups of students with high spatialintelligence superior to those with low spatial intelligence. The conclusion of this research isthe use of mind mapping learning model is superior compared to the learning model ofstudents who have high spatial intelligence and the interaction between the learning modelwith keverdasan spsasila tinggigi in improving the outcomes of Indonesian history

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call