Abstract

This research is backgrounded by low student learning outcomes which refers to students' critical thinking ability hampered by the use of learning models. This study aims to determine the difference in science critical thinking skills between students who are given the Problem Based Learning (PBL) learning model and students who are given conventional learning models. This research uses a Quasi-Experimental research method with a Nonequivalent Control Group Design design. The population subjects in this study were grade V students of SDN Cogreg 1 Tangerang Regency by taking a sample of two classes of 64 students, V A class which totaled 32 people as a control class, and V B class which amounted to 32 people as an experimental class. Data collection technique using critical thinking ability test question instruments in the form of 10 questions. Based on the results of hypothesis test data analysis using a t-test at a significance level of 0.05, it is calculated > ttabel which is 2.11 > 2.00, so that H0 is rejected and accepted. Thus, it can be said that there are differences in the ability to think critically in science between students who are given the Problem Based Learning (PBL) learning model and students who are given conventional learning models.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.