Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of reporting pathways and retaliation on someone's intention to do whistleblowing. The population in this study is the Employees of the Regional Finance Agency of West Sumatra Province. The first hypothesis of this study is that individuals who deal with anonymous reporting channels will be more likely to show whistleblowing than individuals who face non-anonymous reporting pathways and the second hypothesis is individuals who face low retaliation potential will be more likely to show intention to do whistleblowing than individuals who face high retaliation potential. Experimental research with a 2 x 2 factorial design was conducted. 80 employees of the West Sumatra province's financial services have contributed to the experiment. One Way ANOVA is used in hypothesis testing. The results showed that the reporting path did not significantly influence the intention to conduct whistleblowing with the significance value from the One Way ANOVA analysis test of 0.29> 0.05. Retaliation has no significant effect on whistleblowing intentions, with the significance value of the One Way ANOVA analysis test being 0.73> 0.05.
Highlights
Melakukan Whistleblowing (Studi Eksperimen pada Pegawai Badan Keuangan Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat)
This study aims to examine the effect of reporting pathways and retaliation on someone's intention to do whistleblowing
The results showed that the reporting path did not significantly influence the intention to conduct whistleblowing with the significance value from the One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) analysis test of 0.29> 0.05
Summary
Melakukan Whistleblowing (Studi Eksperimen pada Pegawai Badan Keuangan Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana pengaruh jalur pelaporan anonymous dengan jalur pelaporan non-anonymous dan pengaruh tinggi atau rendahnya tingkat retaliasi terhadap niat seseorang melakukan whistleblowing melalui metode kuasi eksperimen, percobaan desain menjadi 2 X 2 faktorial. Pada hasil perbandingan tersebut disimpulkan bahwa individu yang menggunakan jalur pelaporan anonymous dan nonanonymous sama-sama sangat mungkin untuk melaporkan tindakan whistleblowing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have