Penetration Testing Platforms for Active Directory Network Environment

Abstract

The security of Active Directory environments is a crucial aspect for organizations of all sizes. With the increasing number of cyber threats, it is important to understand the different penetration testing paradigms that can be used to attack these environments. This research focuses on a comparative analysis of four specific attacks: LLMNR poisoning, SMB relay, pass the hash, and token impersonation. The comparison is based on relevant criteria such as complexity, required tools, and susceptibility to defense mechanisms. The primary objective of this study was to build a virtual Active Directory network, which provides a controlled environment for testing the different attacks. This enabled us to evaluate the effectiveness of each attack and gather insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each paradigm. By conducting a comparative analysis using these criteria, we were able to determine the most effective methods for defending against these types of attacks and identify areas for improvement. The results of this study provide valuable insights into the security risks that organizations face when it comes to Active Directory environments. By understanding the different strengths and weaknesses of each attack, organizations can make informed decisions about which mitigation strategies to implement. This research also highlights the importance of continuous monitoring and testing to ensure the security of Active Directory environments. This comparative analysis provides a comprehensive overview of four key penetration testing paradigms for Active Directory environments. The results of this study can help organizations to better understand the security risks they face and implement effective mitigation strategies.