Abstract

The North American wood decking market mostly relies on easily treatable Southern yellow pine (SYP), which is being impregnated with micronized copper (MC) wood preservatives since 2006. These formulations are composed of copper (Cu) carbonate particles (CuCO3·Cu(OH)2), with sizes ranging from 1 nm to 250 μm, according to manufacturers. MC-treated SYP wood is protected against decay by solubilized Cu2+ ions and unreacted CuCO3·Cu(OH)2 particles that successively release Cu2+ ions (reservoir effect). The wood species used for the European wood decking market differ from the North American SYP. One of the most common species is Norway spruce wood, which is poorly treatable i.e. refractory due to the anatomical properties, like pore size and structure, and chemical composition, like pit membrane components or presence of wood extractives. Therefore, MC formulations may not suitable for refractory wood species common in the European market, despite their good performance in SYP. We evaluated the penetration effectiveness of MC azole (MCA) in easily treatable Scots pine and in refractory Norway spruce wood. We assessed the effectiveness against the Cu-tolerant wood-destroying fungus Rhodonia placenta. Our findings show that MCA cannot easily penetrate refractory wood species and could not confirm the presence of a reservoir effect.

Highlights

  • Wood is a widely used building material and one of the reasons is its availability in various countries

  • The three wood materials considered share the same preservative retention pattern across all diluted MC azole (MCA)-pressure-treated wood samples (2.00%, 1.60%, 1.33%, 1.07%, 0.80%), which decreases with the MCA concentration applied

  • The aim of this study was to assess if micronized copper (MC) could penetrate refractory wood species without pretreatment, i.e. incising, and provide an added value than conventional wood preservatives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wood is a widely used building material and one of the reasons is its availability in various countries. This results in a geographic-dependent decking market, as each country mostly utilizes the most accessible wood species. The North American market mostly uses SYP [1], whereas Norway spruce is the most used species in Central Europe [2]. The choice of a certain wood species for building applications results in clearly defined performance and service life, which can range from a few to many years. PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163124 September 20, 2016

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call