Abstract
This study aims to determine learning outcomes using the Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) model assisted with macromedia flash compared to Discovery Learning assisted with macromedia flash on the reaction rate material. The study population was all students of class XI MIPA MAN 3 Medan. The sampling technique in this study is simple random sampling. The selected sample is Class XI MIPA 1 as an experimental class I which is treated with a Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) model assisted by macromedia flash and Class XI MIPA 3 as an experimental class II which is treated with a Discovery Learning model assisted by macromedia flash. This study uses test instruments that have been tested and are valid. Student learning outcomes data are first tested for normality and homogeneity, where the results obtained by both groups of samples are homogeneous and normally distributed. Hypothesis testing uses the Independent Sample T-Test, with the results of the research obtained a significance value of 0.047. Thus, there are significant differences in student learning outcomes taught using the Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) model with Discovery Learning assisted by macromedia flash with a result of 14% using the STAD model better than Discovery Learning.Keywords: Learning Outcomes, Student Collaboration, Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD), Discovery Learning, Reaction Rate
Highlights
ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bermaksud untuk melihat ada atau tidaknya perbedaan yang signifikan dari hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) dengan hasil Discovery Learning, dimana keduanya menggunakan bantuan Macromedia Flash pada materi laju reaksi
This study aims to determine learning outcomes using the Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) model assisted with macromedia flash compared to Discovery Learning assisted with macromedia flash on the reaction rate material
Selain mengukur ketuntasan belajar siswa dalam mencapai tujuan pembelajaran melalui tes dalam bentuk soal, tentu sebaiknya guru dapat menilai siswa melalui nilai sehari-hari selama proses pembelajaran yang meliputi aktivitas siswa serta proses perubahan tingkah laku (afektif) siswa
Summary
Dari perhitungan hasil tes untuk kedua kelas eksperimen, diperoleh nilai rata-rata pretest pada kelas eksperimen I sebesar 48,18±2,94 sedangkan nilai rata-rata posttest sebesar 80,76±2,81 Untuk kelas ekpserimen II diperoleh nilai pretest 43,64±2,80 dan nilai rata-rata posttest sebesar 76,52±2.92. Hasil nilai ratarata pretest dan posttest ssiwa MAN 3 Medan dapat dilihat pada Gambar 1
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.