Penalties vs. Subsidies: A Study on Which Is Better to Promote Corporate Environmental Governance

Abstract

To reverse the trend of ecological environment deterioration, the government tries to stimulate firms to participate in environmental governance through environmental regulation. Then, which environmental regulation tools can better drive firms to carry out environmental governance activities needs to be corroborated by empirical studies. Using a sample consisting of Chinese A-shares listed firms from 2015 to 2019, this article investigated the effects of two heterogeneous environmental regulation tools (environmental penalties and environmental subsidies) and their interactions on corporate environmental investment. The results showed that environmental penalties have a positive impact on corporate environmental investment. Furthermore, the heavier the penalty or the higher the administrative level of the penalty subject, the more pronounced is the impact of environmental penalties on corporate environmental investment. Firms that receive environmental subsidies do not increase their investment in environmental governance. A series of robustness tests further verify that penalties have a greater impact on the environment than subsidies. In addition, it is found that environmental penalties have an environmental deterrent effect on other firms in the same industry. Our work presents evidence for the economic consequences of environmental regulation and supplements the mechanism of environmental regulation affecting corporate environmental governance. Meanwhile, this article also provides essential guidance for the positive role of environmental penalties in driving corporate environmental governance and has important practical significance for emerging market countries to choose appropriate environmental regulation tools to promote corporate green development.