Abstract
In 2010, Congress codified the economic substance doctrine and created a strict liability penalty for understatements attributable to transactions that did not have economic substance. Recent court decisions have refused to invalidate transactions based on economic substance and have focused instead on other doctrines such as sham transaction and substance over form. This may have implications for the strict liability penalty incorporated into the economic substance doctrine.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
