Abstract
Ibn Hazm al Qurthubi is among the opponents of the use of illat<br />and qiyas arguing that nash of al-Qur’an and Hadith can be<br />applied to any problems simply by understanding ma’na and<br />dhahir of texts. Reasoning of musbit al-Qiyas (the proponents of<br />Qiyas) that syari’a does not provide answer to all problems is a<br />false logic according to Ibn Hazm since this argument contradicts<br />to al-Qur’an’s statement. Whoever uses qiyas as a legal reasoning<br />is similar to believing that Qur’an is failed to provide guidance. In<br />the process of legal reasoning, Ibn Hazm would refer to al-Qur’an,<br />Hadith and Ijma’. Should those three sources do not provide the<br />answer, he used dalil by understading the hidden meaning of the<br />texts. <br /><br />
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
