Abstract
Abu Zayd reconstruct the concept of texts with linguistic approach ( al-manhaj al-ta h lil al-lughawi ) in the broadest sense, including hermeneutics and semeotics. For Abu Zayd, ta’wil different tafsir. He looked ta'wil as productive and objective reading as opposed to talwin, which tendentious reading-ideological ( qirâ'ah mughridah aydulujiyyah ). The implications of understanding ta'wil of Abu Zayd are: First, there is something missing in understanding the text of the Qur’an, the awareness of the historicity of religious texts, that he is the text linguistics and that language is a social and cultural product. Second, put the text in the context of the Qur'an as a whole. By doing this Abu Zayd hope that the unspeakable (implicit) can be disclosed. Therefore, Abu Zayd borrow distinction adil-dhahir about mabda' (principle), qâ'idah (rules), and hukm (law). Qâ'idah is the derivation of Mabda ’ and must not conflict with it. Hukm can not be qâ'idah let alone be m abda' . Hukm is specific events and relative. Third, Abu Zayd suggested to a renewal of Islamic law based on the distinction of adil dhahir.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
