Abstract

To determine the effect of variations in pelvicalyceal volume on the results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and the relationship of stone load to estimated pelvicalyceal volume in patients with renal pelvic stones. In all, 204 patients with renal pelvic stones were treated primarily by ESWL. Exclusion criteria were radiolucent stones, dilatation of the renal collecting system, JJ stent insertion before ESWL and an inadequate follow-up. The surface area of the stones and the renal collecting system were measured using a grid of 1 mm2 divisions. The pelvicalyceal volume was calculated as 0.6 (area)1.27. To evaluate the treatment results a pelvicalyceal stone load (PSL) index, describing the relationship of stone load to total estimated pelvicalyceal volume, was defined as stone volume/renal collecting system volume. The mean (range) pelvicalyceal volume of the patients was 13.24 (4.12-28.47) mm3 and the mean PSL index was 26.2%. The cumulative success rates according to the PSL decreased from 97% to 90% with increasing PSL, but remained at > 95% in patients with a PSL index of < 50%. In all, 184 sessions were applied and the session/patient ratio increased from 1.41 to 3.0 with increasing PSL. Complications were acute pyelonephritis in three and steinstrasse in five patients. The PSL index appears to be a more accurate and reproducible method for predicting the outcome of ESWL, and has the advantage of considering the effect of pelvicalyceal anatomy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.