Abstract
ContextPelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in localized prostate cancer is feasible through an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach. Data comparing the three approaches is sparse. ObjectiveTo perform a review in order to compare the effectiveness of the different PLND approaches. Acquisition of evidenceA search was performed including the following words: ("pelvic lymph node dissection") OR ("pelvic lymphadenectomy") AND ("french"[Language] OR english[Language]) AND ("1990"[Date - Publication]: "3000"[Date - Publication]) AND prostatectomy[Title]). Twenty-nine articles were finally included in the qualitative synthesis. Evidence SynthesisLaparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer is a minimally invasive procedure with a relatively short operative time, minimal blood loss, lower level of pain, shorter hospital stay, and fewer perioperative complications when compared to an open approach. This technique is more cost-effective than a robot-assisted approach. ConclusionConcerning the treatment of localized prostate cancer, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection should be learned and applied by urologists.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have