Abstract

ContextPelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in localized prostate cancer is feasible through an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach. Data comparing the three approaches is sparse. ObjectiveTo perform a review in order to compare the effectiveness of the different PLND approaches. Acquisition of evidenceA search was performed including the following words: ("pelvic lymph node dissection") OR ("pelvic lymphadenectomy") AND ("french"[Language] OR english[Language]) AND ("1990"[Date - Publication]: "3000"[Date - Publication]) AND prostatectomy[Title]). Twenty-nine articles were finally included in the qualitative synthesis. Evidence SynthesisLaparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer is a minimally invasive procedure with a relatively short operative time, minimal blood loss, lower level of pain, shorter hospital stay, and fewer perioperative complications when compared to an open approach. This technique is more cost-effective than a robot-assisted approach. ConclusionConcerning the treatment of localized prostate cancer, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection should be learned and applied by urologists.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call