Abstract
To examine the application of quantitative 2-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (2D PC-MRI) for treating patients with pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis by using quantitative 2D PC-MRI data enrolled between April 2017 and Sep 2023. In addition, 32 healthy female controls (HCs) were included. Most patients with PCS presented with chronic pelvic pain and more than half had extra-pelvic venous symptoms (80/81, 98% and 45/81, 56%, respectively). Quantitative 2D PC-MRI analyzed the 81 patients with PCS, 239 patients without PCS, and 32 HCs. The patients with PCS had higher stroke volume (SV), absolute SV (ASV), and mean flux (MF) in the calf region (interstitial pixel shift) than did the HCs. In the left gonadal vein, the patients with PCS had higher SV, backward flow volume (BFV), ASV, and MF and lower forward flow volume (FFV), stroke distance (SD), and mean velocity (MV) than did the HCs. However, the patients with PCS had lower SV, FFV, MF, SD, and MV in the great saphenous veins. Quantitative 2D PC-MRI analysis revealed that the PCS group had higher SV, FFV, BFV, ASV, and MF in the calf region than did the non-PCS group. The variables that most strongly differentiated the patients with PCS from the HCs were SV in the great saphenous veins, SD in the great saphenous veins and left gonadal vein, and MV in the great saphenous veins and left gonadal vein. Caudal flow in the left gonadal vein was identified in half of the patients with PCS (39/81, 48.1%); 14 of them received embolization for left gonadal vein. In additional to providing an objective 3-dimensional morphology of the pelvic veins and extra-pelvic leaks, quantitative 2D PC-MRI analysis reveals distinct hemodynamic profiles between patients with PCS, those without PCS, and HCs, especially in the gonadal veins and regional perfusion of the calves.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International journal of surgery (London, England)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.