Abstract

This study aimed to disentangle the effects of Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability (MBID) and Behavior Disorders (BD)on risk taking in circumstances where peer influence was absent or present. We studied 319 adolescents in four groups: MBID-only, MBID+BD, BD-only, and typically developing controls. The Balloon Analogue Risk-Task (BART), in a solo or peer condition, was used as a proxy of real-life risk-taking. Results show a significant main effect of BART condition. Post-hoc tests indicated higher risk-taking in the peer compared to the solo condition in all groups except BD-only. Moreover, risk taking was increased in adolescents with MBID compared to adolescents without MBID, but only under peer-influence. No main or interaction effects with BD were observed. Model based decomposition of BART performance in underlying processes showed that the MBID related increase in risk-taking under peer-influence was mainly related to increased risk-taking propensity, and in the MBID-only group also to increased safety estimates and increased confidence in these safety estimates. The present study shows that risk-taking in MBID may be better explained by low intellectual functioning than by comorbid BD, and may not originate in increased risk taking per se, but may rather be related to risk-taking under peer-influence, which is a complex, multifaceted risk-taking context. Therefore, interventions to decrease risk-taking by adolescents with MBID that specifically target peer-influence may be successful.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to disentangle the effects of Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability (MBID) and Behavior Disorders (BD)on risk taking in circumstances where peer influence was absent or present

  • Adjusted Pumps To investigate effects of MBID, BD and Peer-influence on Balloon Analogue Risk-Task (BART) risk-taking, the first set of analyses was performed on the adjusted average pumps

  • This study assessed whether individual differences in intellectual functioning and behavior disorder are associated to risktaking in situations in which peer influence is absent or present

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aimed to disentangle the effects of Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability (MBID) and Behavior Disorders (BD)on risk taking in circumstances where peer influence was absent or present. The dominant explanation in the literature for adolescent risk-taking is related to an imbalance in brain development with a protracted development of the cognitive control system relative to high reactivity in the reward system (Steinberg 2010). Chein et al (2011) show that peer presence enhances reactivity in the brain’s reward circuitry, thereby increasing risk-taking, suggesting an influence of presence of peers on reward valence. Factors related to the explanation of adolescent risk-taking are cognitive control processes, reactivity of the reward system to reward and social cues and social-cognition

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call