Abstract

The active participation of small-scale prosumers and consumers with demand-response capability and renewable resources can be a potential solution to the environmental issues and flexibility-related challenges. A local peer-to-peer market is proposed to exploit the maximum flexibility potential of prosumers. In this local market, network users can trade with each other as well as the grid. The proposed trading model includes two levels to consider both the democracy and the profitability of energy trading. At the first level, the model considers the trading preferences of each player to respect the peers’ choices. The second level matches the rest of the bids and offers of the local buyers and sellers aiming to maximize the social welfare of all of the players participating in the local market. Our proposed local market is implemented for a test system consisting of fifteen residential players, and the results are compared to other trading models through different comparison criteria such as social-welfare of all players and the net cost of each individual player from consuming electricity. Simulation results for the case study demonstrate that the proposed local market model can still be profitable and liquid while respecting the players’ trading preferences and choices.

Highlights

  • PAPER CONTRIBUTION, ASSUMPTIONS, AND ORGANIZATION This paper proposes a novel local P2P trading model for prosumers and consumers under the supervision of a local market operator (LMO)

  • This paper proposed a new local market structure for peerto-peer trading that incentivizes small-scale prosumers and consumers to play a more active role in energy markets

  • The proposed model consists of two levels

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the work proposed by [34], the matching of small-scale players’ bids and offers are based on the local network flexibility needs It ignores the trading preferences of the peers. The existing LM and P2P trading model structures mainly suffer from the following limitations: 1- The game theory-based approaches need the contribution and cooperation of rational participants in the process of matching bids with offers, which may not be a valid assumption. In order to engage small-scale customers to participate in local energy trading, first, prosumers and consumers should be allowed to choose their trading partners freely. It respects the preference of peers to choose their trading partners and their buying/selling prices It seeks profitable energy trading in the LM because it aims to maximize the social welfare of the LM players. The LM clearing mechanism matches bidding blocks with the offering blocks, according to different offered and bided prices

A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EXISTING SIMILAR LITERATURE AND OUR
HOUSEHOLD BIDDING AND OFFERING STRATEGIES
FIRST LEVEL
SECOND LEVEL
CASE STUDY AND NUMERICAL RESULTS
Objective
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.