Peer review statement

Abstract

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind review. The authors and the reviewers do not know each other. The managing editor send the papers to the reviewers by hiding the authors’ name and their affiliation.• Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? There were 13 aspects of assessment for accepting/declining papers, i.e. Clarity of abstract, Significance of research, Sufficiency state of the art, Contribution to the field (novelty), Research objective, Appropriateness of the research method, Relevance and clarity of drawings, graphs and tables, Experimental/evidential support, Quality of data or findings, Discussion and conclusions, Direction for future research and recommendations, Clarity of English, Writing style (according to EES format). There are no opportunities to resubmit papers after rejection. For the revised papers regarding to reviewer comments, they should resubmit their papers.• Conference submission management system: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=icege2020• Number of submissions received: 219• Number of submissions sent for review: 198• Number of submissions accepted: 130• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 59,4 %• Average number of reviewers per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 50• Any additional info on review process (ie. plagiarism check system): We used TURNITIN software to check the plagiarism issue during the review process.• Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Sumardi, M.Hum.Universitas Jember, Indonesiasumardi.fkip@unej.ac.id