Abstract
Scientific publication is fundamentally based on peer review—a process whereby reviewers are asked to evaluate the scientific merits of the submitted manuscript contents and provide feedback.1 It is hoped that through this peer review process, good science is enhanced and bad science is dismissed.2 Journal editors will discuss the merits of a manuscript critically informed by the reviews provided.3 An invitation to conduct peer review is a chance to serve as the arbiter of scientific quality and an opportunity to participate directly in the dissemination of new knowledge. Unfortunately, many reviewers never receive formal guidance or mentorship on how best to review an original research manuscript. With the growth of academic medicine and the proliferation of open-access journals, high-quality peer reviews have …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
